What is the SQE?
Who is the SQE for?
Costs and fees
Dates and locations
Assessment information
The assessment day
Results and resits
Due to inactivity, and for security reasons, you will be automatically logged out of your SQE account in 1 minute.
Press ’continue’ to stay logged in.
The monitoring and maximising diversity survey has been updated. Please return to the survey to reconfirm your answers and complete the new section at the end.
You must do this to remain eligible for the SQE. You will not be able to book your next assessment until you have updated your answers.
Last updated: April 2024
Introduction
Scope and purpose
Kaplan SQE Limited (Kaplan SQE) has been appointed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority Limited (“SRA”) as the sole provider of the Solicitors Qualifying Examination (“the SQE”) and the End Point Assessment Organisation (“EPAO”) for Solicitor Apprentices. Kaplan SQE handles mitigating circumstances in accordance with this Policy as required by the SRA.
Decisions on mitigating circumstances rest with the SQE Assessment Board as provided by regulations 8.4 and 12 of the SQE Assessment Regulations. This Policy sets out the procedures to be followed in cases where a candidate wishes to submit a claim for mitigating circumstances in SQE1 and/or SQE2.
SQE1 consists of two assessments, FLK1 and FLK2. FLK1 and FLK2 must be taken in a single assessment window, except as outlined in regulation 4.3 of the SQE Assessment Regulations. Both must be passed to pass SQE1. The SQE Assessment Board will consider a mitigating circumstances claim from candidates who have attempted either FLK1 or FLK2 or both. Candidates who fail to attend all of the SQE1 assessments they have booked are not covered by this policy, and should instead refer to the SQE Assessment Terms and Conditions (see 2.3 below).
SQE2 is a single assessment comprising 16 individual assessment stations, across two parts, SQE2 oral and SQE2 written, within an assessment window. The SQE Assessment Board will consider a claim for mitigating circumstances affecting one or more of the assessment stations comprising SQE2. Candidates who fail to attend the entire SQE2 assessment are not covered by this policy, and should instead refer to the SQE Assessment Terms and Conditions.
Fairness
We are committed to ensuring that this Policy is fair and transparent and is operated in a manner which:
Confidentiality
Information provided by candidates under these procedures will be treated confidentially and only shared with those persons necessary to consider their claim.
Timescales
We expect that candidates will meet the time limits outlined in the policy. Where there are exceptional circumstances which mean a candidate cannot reasonably meet such time limits they must communicate this to us at the earliest opportunity and submit evidence to justify the delay. Where accepted, and where possible, new timescales may be agreed (see section 4.8).
Candidates with a disability
Where a candidate has a disability, information will be made available to them in appropriate formats and reasonable adjustments will be made to accommodate their needs.
Review of this Policy
This Policy will be monitored on an ongoing basis and any necessary amendments will be made and implemented at the earliest opportunity. As a minimum, Kaplan SQE will review this and all associated policies on an annual basis as part of its quality assurance procedures.
Claims for mitigating circumstances
Definition
For the purpose of this Policy, “Mitigating Circumstances” has the following meaning:
which have, or are likely to, materially and adversely affect a candidate's marks or performance in the assessment.
Candidates who consider that their marks or performance in any element of an SQE assessment have been, or are likely to have been, materially and adversely affected by any of the circumstances outlined in 2.1, or who consider that their failure to attend an assessment can be attributed to any of those circumstances, may make a claim for mitigating circumstances.
For the avoidance of doubt, candidates cannot make a claim for mitigating circumstances if they:
A candidate who fails to attend all booked assessments within an assessment window, as described in 2.3, will not be considered to have attempted the relevant assessment. In the event of such non-attendance by a candidate for any reason, the cancellation charges specified in the SQE Assessment Terms and Conditions shall apply.
A candidate who is booked to attend both FLK1 and FLK2 SQE1 assessments but who fails to attend one of these assessments should submit a claim for mitigating circumstances providing clear evidence for their non-attendance. Rejected claims, or where no claim is made will result in an attempt being registered for both assessments, including the one that was not attended.
Disagreement with the academic judgement of the assessors cannot amount to mitigating circumstances. Academic judgement means the professional and scholarly knowledge and expertise which the assessors have drawn on to reach a decision about a candidate’s performance in an assessment.
A candidate who considers that their performance is likely to be affected by mitigating circumstances as described in 2.1(c) which arise before the assessment window is normally expected to withdraw from the assessment and sit it at a later date. Candidates in this position should refer to the SQE Assessment Terms and Conditions. A mitigating circumstances claim made in respect of circumstances existing before the assessment will not usually be accepted or considered, unless a candidate is able to clearly evidence why they attempted the assessment and signed the ‘fit to sit’ declaration.
Where mitigating circumstances arise during the assessment, the candidate must report the mitigating circumstances to an invigilator as soon as possible and at the latest before leaving the venue.
Candidates reporting mitigating circumstances during an assessment will not normally be allowed any additional time to complete an assessment unless an error of process on the part of Kaplan SQE or the test centre has denied them the full time to complete the assessment and it is practicable to allow additional time.
Ongoing medical conditions or disabilities that affect candidates do not fall within mitigating circumstances as defined by this Policy. Arrangements for meeting the needs of candidates who have ongoing conditions and/or a disability are dealt with according to the SQE Reasonable Adjustments Policy. We do recognise however, that there may be circumstances when a candidate may experience specific difficulties related to their condition during an assessment, which may need to be considered under this Policy (for example a flare-up). Where this occurs, the candidate should submit a Mitigating Circumstances claim. When assessing that claim, the Assessment Board will be entitled to also consider the reasonable adjustments that were put in place during the assessment.
Circumstances which would not usually meet the definition of mitigating circumstances
The following are examples of the circumstances which would not usually meet the definition of mitigating circumstances. This list is not exhaustive.
Making a claim
If a candidate wishes to proceed with a claim for mitigating circumstances, they must complete and submit the SQE1 Mitigating Circumstances Form and SQE2 Mitigating Circumstances Form.
For SQE1, all claims should be made by 16:00 GMT on the fifth working day after the relevant booked assessment day.
For SQE2, all claims should be made by 16:00 GMT on the fifth working day after the end of the assessment window in question.
The Form must be accompanied by independent supporting written evidence as appropriate for the mitigating circumstances raised. Where a claim is made on the grounds of illness under 2.1(c), a medical certificate must be provided as evidence of illness including relevant dates and the nature, onset and duration of the condition.
Where written evidence cannot be provided within the five working days, the Mitigating Circumstances Form should still be submitted by the five working day deadline. The candidate must contact the Equality and Quality Team (equality.quality@sqe.sra.org.uk) who will advise the candidate of the deadline for submission of the outstanding independent written evidence. The deadline for submission will be with reference to ensuring that the mitigating circumstances claim can be considered by the Mitigating Circumstance Panel (MCP).
Where independent written evidence cannot be provided, the Panel will reach a decision on the claim based on the information available and circumstances in the claim.
We will acknowledge receipt of the Mitigating Circumstances Form within five working days of receiving it.
As noted in 1.4, candidates are expected to meet the time limits in communicating with us. In the event this is not possible candidates should contact us at enquiries@sqe.sra.org.uk to outline the reason for the delay. Amended deadlines may be agreed, where possible, with reference to ensuring that the mitigating circumstances claim can be considered by the MCP. Claims received outside of the time limits will only be considered in exceptional circumstances where independent supporting written evidence can be provided as to why the required timeframes could not be met.
Kaplan SQE reserves the right to verify the authenticity of all evidence submitted in respect of mitigating circumstance claims.
Consideration of claim
Claims will be considered by the MCP that will determine (a) whether the claim amounts to mitigating circumstances; and (b) whether the evidence presented substantiates the facts on which the claim is made. Where necessary, the MCP may call for further evidence and/or undertake an investigation. The standard of proof in a mitigating circumstance claim is on the balance of probabilities.
All evidence submitted must be written in English, or Welsh at the candidate’s choice where the candidate sat the assessment in Welsh. Where the original evidence is not written in English or Welsh, the candidate must submit a verified translation at the candidate’s expense.
The MCP will comprise of at least two representatives of Kaplan SQE and a representative of the Solicitors Regulation Authority. The MCP will convene to review candidate claims and will record in writing its recommendation to the Assessment Board in relation to each claim.
Recommendations of the MCP will be reported to the Assessment Board for approval.
Where the Assessment Board accepts a Mitigating Circumstances claim, the Board will discount the attempt which was subject to the claim. The pass mark and a candidate mark cannot be changed. Candidates should note that even though SQE2 comprises 16 individual assessment stations, SQE2 is a single assessment of competence. Where mitigating circumstances are accepted for any of the assessment stations comprising SQE2, the candidate will be required to retake all of the assessment stations comprising SQE2.
Where the attempt which was subject to the claim is discounted, a refund for all or part of the fee of the assessment may be made, in accordance with the SQE Assessment Terms and Conditions.
Providing false information and / or making a fraudulent Mitigating Circumstances claim amounts to malpractice and improper conduct, and would be dealt with under regulation 13 of the SQE Assessment Regulations.
A candidate who disagrees with the decision of the Assessment Board may appeal against the decision provided that they are able to establish a ground for the appeal as set out in the SQE Appeals Policy.
SQE Mitigating Circumstances Policy (applicable for assessments to May 2023) (PDF 189KB)
Create your personal SQE account and book your assessments.
Find out what happens after passing the SQE and admission to the roll of solicitors.